Skip to main content

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

A collection of questions about the proposal and the situation are below. Click on a question to reveal the answer.

Have a question that you don’t see? Use the Google Form to submit a question.

 

Overview

 

  • If the proposal is approved by voters, the district would be able to generate $6 million annually, giving the District the ability to create additional classroom spaces at each of our four schools while other funds will be used to staff, maintain, and support these additional classrooms in order to keep class sizes reasonable. The timeline for planning and construction would be developed quickly but could take up to two years to build the additions onto each building. Please refer to the presentation linked at the top of the webpage for more details.

     

  • If the proposal is not approved, SD113A would continue to face challenges due to rapidly growing enrollment and space constraints. While the district values keeping class sizes reasonable, there would be a need to increase class sizes at most grade levels. The district would also have to make decisions around potential programming cuts in order to have more dedicated classrooms. Additionally, larger spaces in the schools like Library Resource Centers or dedicated specials’ classrooms may need to be transformed into general education classrooms with those programs either becoming mobile (on carts) or being eliminated.

  • In Illinois education, the "limiting rate" is the maximum property tax rate a school district can levy for funds subject to the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL). It acts as a revenue control mechanism, capping a district's annual property tax extensions to the lesser of 5% or the rate of inflation (CPI).

Financial

  • The financial challenges District 113A faces today are not the result of overspending. Compared with peer districts, District 113A operates with a lower tax rate, lower per-pupil spending, and lower State funding, clear evidence of long-standing fiscal discipline and careful resource management. Many peer districts have tax rates significantly higher than District 113A’s, receive substantially more State Evidence-Based Funding per student, and spend significantly more per pupil each year, underscoring the District’s sustained commitment to fiscal responsibility.

    Many peer districts have tax rates up to 45% higher than District 113A’s, receive substantially more State Evidence-Based Funding per student, and spend at  least 30% more per pupil each year,  underscoring the District’s sustained  commitment to fiscal responsibility.

    Tax Rate Comparison 

    Tax Rate Comparison Chart

    113A 1.968
    Downers Grove GSD 58 2.237
    Hinsdale CCSD 181 2.465
    Center Cass SD 66 2.610
    CCSD 180 2.704
    Palos 128 2.851
    Maercker SD 60 2.921
    Cass SD 63 2.930
    Will County SD 92 2.939
    Palos CCSD 118 3.037
    Homer CCSD 33C 3.653
    North Palos SD 117 3.925
    Woodridge SD 68 3.949
    CCSD 146 4.580
    Lisle CUSD 202 4.862
  • The financial challenges District 113A faces today are not the result of overspending. Compared with peer districts, District 113A operates with a lower tax rate, lower per-pupil spending, and lower State funding, clear evidence of longstanding fiscal discipline and careful resource management. Many peer districts have tax rates significantly higher than District 113A’s, receive substantially more State Evidence-Based Funding per student, and spend significantly more per pupil each year, underscoring the District’s sustained commitment to fiscal responsibility.

    Instructional Spending comparison

    Instructional Per Pupil Spending Comparison 

    113A $8,054
    Homer 33C $8,879
    Cass SD 63 $9,459
    Maercker SD 60 $9,916
    Palos 118 $9,961
    Center Cass 66 $10,078
    Palos 128 $10,279
    North Palos 117 $10,375
    Darien SD 61 $10,601
    Gower SD 62 $10,936
    DG 58 $11,096
    Woodridge SD 68 $11,733
    State $11,785
    Will County SD 92 $12,486
    Hinsdale 181 $14,066
    Lisle SD 202 $14,788
    Burr Ridge 180 $15,050

     

    Operational Spending comparison \

    Operational Per Pupil Spending Comparison 

    113A $13,537
    Homer 33C $15,499
    Palos 128 $15,681
    Palos 118 $15,867
    Center Cass 66 $15,919
    North Palos 117 $16,486
    Darien SD 61 $16,845
    Cass SD 63 $17,278
    Maercker SD 60 $17,999
    Woodridge SD 68 $18,416
    Gower SD 62 $19,070
    DG 58 $19,593
    State $20,129
    Hinsdale 181 $22,402
    Will County SD 92 $22,670
    Lisle SD 202 $25,138
    Burr Ridge CCSD 180 $28,233
  • District 113A is placing a limiting rate referendum on the November 2026 ballot. If approved, the limiting rate increase would generate an estimated $6,000,000 annually. Use the online tax calculator to calculate your home’s tax impact.

    Tax Impact table

The Plan and Process

  • In 2022-2023, the District reopened Central School as part of its plan to address increasing enrollment and reduce class sizes. That plan accomplished its intended goal and provided additional classroom space across the District.

    Since that time, however, enrollment has continued to grow. Approximately 300 additional students have enrolled in the District since Central reopened, creating new space needs that were not present in 2022-2023. The District has continued to monitor this growth through multiple independent enrollment studies, including the most recent study in 2026. 

    As enrollment has increased, the District has taken a measured approach—using existing space efficiently, making adjustments within its schools, and continuing to monitor enrollment before considering larger facility investments.

    Based on current enrollment and projections, additional classroom space is now needed to maintain reasonable class sizes and provide appropriate learning environments for students. Rather than constructing a new school, which is estimated to cost approximately $65–70 million or more, the District is proposing additions to its existing school campuses. This approach is intended to address current and projected enrollment needs while making use of the District’s existing facilities and infrastructure.

  • SD113A has proactively worked to manage growth:

    • Reopened Central School for the 2022-23 school year
    • Repurposed internal spaces (LRCs, shared rooms)
    • Adjusted staffing to meet increasing enrollment
    • Explored reclaiming district-owned property
    • Conducted multiple demographic studies
    • Participated in Village Technical Review Committee processes
    • Acquired adjacent property to expand parking at Central
  • To address current and future capacity needs, SD113A has evaluated short and long term facility expansion solutions including:

    • Classroom additions at all existing schools
    • Use of modular (temporary) classrooms
    • Reclaiming district-owned facilities
    • Building a new school
  • We currently do not have available classroom space at our four schools to be able to handle current and projected enrollment increases.

  • SD113A is a good steward of taxpayer dollars, and when facing challenges with space, opted for the most cost-effective solution for facilities, which is adding onto current buildings. We considered building a new building; however, the cost was the highest of the options. Additionally, other districts have utilized a similar option and found that enrollment numbers didn’t increase to those levels, resulting in school closures, which we want to avoid for our taxpayers.

    Our facilities were built to last and are well-maintained, but the challenges of simply not having enough space to serve our growing student population require the district to look into other options. Additionally, this proposal ensures that not only will we create extra spaces, but we will have the funds to staff those spaces and keep class sizes reasonable while maintaining our commitment to excellence in programming. 

  • Yes. SD113A is partnering with architects to determine the priorities for this proposal which will include renderings of planned additions and renovations. There is not a need to purchase additional land at this time, but the district is closely watching properties around schools with future growth in mind. 

Election